Ambassador-designate to Germany, Femi Fani-Kayode, has expressed strong reservations about the state of Nigeria’s opposition politics, while also making critical remarks about prominent political figures including former presidential candidate Peter Obi and former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar.
Also read: Fani-Kayode Slams Dele Momodu Over Tinubu Comparison
Speaking during an interview with Nigeria Today News Network, Fani-Kayode stated that he would not support the idea of Peter Obi becoming President of Nigeria, though he declined to provide specific reasons for his position.
He also advised Atiku Abubakar to reconsider his presidential ambition, suggesting that it may be time for him to step aside and allow other aspirants to emerge.
Fani-Kayode, a former Minister of Aviation, further argued that opposition politics in Nigeria has weakened significantly, claiming that existing opposition parties lack cohesion, direction, and the capacity to effectively challenge the ruling government.
He specifically criticised the African Democratic Congress (ADC), describing it as lacking ideological clarity and driven primarily by the pursuit of power rather than a coherent political vision.
He contrasted the current opposition landscape with the earlier structure of the All Progressives Congress (APC), which successfully positioned itself as a strong opposition before gaining power.
According to him, the effectiveness of past opposition movements was rooted in unity, strategy, and discipline qualities he believes are currently lacking among opposition parties.
Fani-Kayode maintained that internal divisions and disagreements among opposition figures have further weakened their ability to present a credible alternative to the electorate.
He argued that such fragmentation limits their capacity to hold the government accountable or influence national policy effectively.
Also read: Kano APC denies thuggery allegations by NNPP
He concluded by emphasising that meaningful political leadership requires vision, organisation, and the ability to engage constructively with governance structures, rather than internal conflicts and disunity.



